This might be of interest to a few of you. I had 
                a vision of the trimaran in Waterworld when I read this article.
                
                Chris
              
                Source: Nashua 
                  Telegraph 
                  [Nov 29, 2003] 
                A 69-year-old, 10th-grade Canadian drop-out and his 58-year-old 
                  Norwegian cousin, who himself left school in the eighth grade, 
                  have just been granted two U.S. patents on a process that produces 
                  hydrogen by throwing discarded aluminum cans or foil into water 
                  laced with Drano. 
                Not only is their discovery likely to force scientists to rewrite 
                  basic chemistry texts but it also might open up an easy way 
                  of producing the nonpolluting gas – the so-called "energy 
                  of the future" – from trashed aluminum. 
                Ease of production is vital because while hydrogen is found 
                  widely in nature in water, freeing up the gas is generally expensive 
                  and difficult. 
                The new procedure is so easy that "you can do it in your 
                  sink if you just don’t let kids play with the sodium hydroxide 
                  (a basic component of Drano) when you are done," said George 
                  Jenkins, a University of New Brunswick forestry professor who 
                  has been working with the cousins to develop the technology. 
                
                The genesis for the discovery, said Jim Andersen, a mill owner 
                  from New Denmark, New Brunswick, was the two cousins’ 
                  long-term interest in inventing things – and a book. 
                After reading "The Coming Energy Revolution," which 
                  describes the role of hydrogen as a future energy source, "We 
                  decided to look at it ourselves," said Andersen, who has 
                  worked in the forest industry most of his life. 
                So Erling Reidar Andersen, his Norwegian cousin, started to 
                  fool with various mixtures based on what he knew about diving 
                  suits that produced hydrogen as a by-product of heat. He called 
                  excitedly one night to announce that he had come up with what 
                  he thought was a novel way of making hydrogen in pots on his 
                  kitchen counter. 
                Later, the two Andersens were at the University of New Brunswick 
                  talking to Jenkins about another of their projects and mentioned 
                  what they had found. 
                "My reaction to that was that everyone knows metal in 
                  water can produce hydrogen, but the reactions stop," Jenkins 
                  said. "And I showed them by putting a copper penny in a 
                  glass of water. They said, ‘But our reaction doesn’t 
                  stop.’ " 
                What the two school-drop-out inventors had discovered was that 
                  instead of sodium hydroxide breaking down and creating the aluminum 
                  equivalent of rust to snuff out the reaction – a process 
                  described in most basic chemistry books – the corrosive 
                  chemical was actually a catalyst. That is, it didn’t break 
                  down, and the reaction continued as long as more water and aluminum 
                  were added. 
                Further experiments found that in the right mixture, aluminum 
                  cans are completely dissolved in as little as five minutes. 
                
                Everyone involved takes great pains to point out that this 
                  energy-generating reaction is in no way akin to a famous bogus 
                  table-top energy source – cold fusion. 
                "What you are essentially doing is liberating energy which 
                  was put into the aluminum when it was made," Jenkins said. 
                  "It’s not the same as getting something for nothing 
                  from cold fusion." 
                Outsiders who have looked at the patent agree and say what 
                  the amateur inventors found has real promise. 
                "It is perfectly reasonable and doesn’t violate 
                  any fundamental laws of chemical reactions. That is to say, 
                  it is not, say, a priori bogus, but (the) future will say how 
                  well it works," University of Toronto chemistry professor 
                  Ulrich Fekl said.